5. Using GIS
p>Critically evaluating the accuracy, validity and reliability of your methods and conclusions is a demanding geographical skill. But GIS can help!
By overlaying different data sources onto the same base map, such as primary data you have collected with published secondary data, you can easily compare the two sources.
When evaluating your methods of data collection and resultant conclusions it can be useful to consider the topic of your investigation more widely, again, working spatially can help with this. Re-visit some of the sources you looked at in your contextualising research, or others that you have identified through your work.
- How do data you have collected compare with existing data sets for that area?
- To what extent do the two match?
- To what extent are the two different?
- Why might there be differences? Could the time of day, day of week, or time of year have led to systematic errors in your data?
- How do your anomalies compare against a bigger (longer term or wider area) data set? If you look at them in the bigger picture are they still anomalous?
Even if your primary data does not match the secondary data, it does not automatically mean that your primary data is 'wrong'.
- Do the two data sources actually measure the same thing?
- How old is the secondary data set?
- Could the situation have changed since it was collected?